This webinar discusses the definition of a differing site condition and why there is a need for a Differing Site Conditions clause in a construction contract
The webinar sets forth the history and purpose of the clause and examines the modern Differing Site Conditions clauses.
Discussion of the terms “indications” and “material difference” as well as an overview of the impact of contract disclaimers related to differing site conditions are covered
The webinar explores what conditions are generally not covered by the clause and conditions that are sometimes included within the scope of the clause
This webinar goes on to list the six-part test for a successful differing site condition claim and five additional contractual requirements contractors must comply with in order to prevail. The contractor’s duty to continue work is also examined
A brief discussion of the “reverse differing site condition claim” – an owner claim that may be asserted against the contractor seeking recovery of funds from the contractor when they encounter conditions “materially better than anticipated”
An alternative use for the Differing Site Condition clause is also presented
The webinar explores several Court and Board of Contract Appeal decisions which appear to be slowly eroding the traditional risk allocation commonly accepted under the Differing Site Conditions clause, along with lessons learned from each case
Finally, this webinar provides a list of practical recommendations for both owners and contractors dealing with the risks of differing site conditions
Overview of the webinar
The Differing Site Conditions clause is one of the oldest clauses used in construction contracts, having been created by the U.S. The federal government in 1926. It is generally accepted that the object of the clause is to transfer the risk of latent site conditions to the owner, thus enticing contractors to reduce their contingency cost at the time of the bid. The promise of the clause is that if the contractor encounters a “materially different” condition during the execution of the work, the owner will compensate the contractor for the resulting cost and/or time. For more than 90 years this standard clause has been used widely in both public and private contracts. Most practitioners in the construction industry think they know what the clause means and how it operates. But, in the words of one of the mid-20th century “deans” of construction law, Max E. Greenberg, “It ain’t necessarily so!”Over the years, the Courts and Boards of Contract Appeals have been slowly changing the interpretation of risk allocation under the clause. A series of Court and Board cases have increased the contractor’s risk concerning differing site conditions. This webinar will explore the changes in risk allocation.
Who should attend?
Owner & Contractor Project Managers
Resident Engineers & Architects
Agency Construction Managers
Legal Counsel representing project participants.
Why should you attend?
Webinar attendees will
Learn about the intent of the Differing Site Conditions clause and how it operates.
Learn what conditions are and are not covered by the Differing Site Conditions clause.
Understand what must be demonstrated to prevail on a differing site condition claim and what contractual requirements must be complied with in full.
Become familiar with several Court and Board of Contract Appeal decisions that are changing the “traditional” allocation of risk under the Differing Site Conditions clause.
Live -Coming soon!
Physical CD-DVD of recorded session will be despatched after 72 hrs on completion of payment
This website contains affiliate links in the form of banner ads and text links. This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, Complianceelearn will receive an affiliate commission. When you make a purchase, the price you pay will be the same whether you use the affiliate link or go directly to the vendor’s website using a non-affiliate link. Regardless, we only recommend products or services that we believe will add value to our readers.